PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
PTAB Retains Jurisdiction Of Expired Patents

PTAB Retains Jurisdiction Of Expired Patents

by Matthew Johnson | Mar 7, 2025 | PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics, Standing

By Ellen Geyer and Matt Johnson – The Federal Circuit rejected a recent argument that the PTAB does not have inter partes review (IPR) jurisdiction over expired patents. Because even expired patents involve the grant of public rights, the court explained that...
Lack of Injury In Fact Scuttles Appeal

Lack of Injury In Fact Scuttles Appeal

by Matthew Johnson | Sep 25, 2024 | Federal Circuit Appeal, PTAB News, Standing

By Lexi Heon, Lisamarie LoGiudice, and Matt Johnson – The Federal Circuit dismissed Platinum Optics Technology Inc.’s (PTOT) appeal from an IPR decision, finding the challenged claims of Viavi’s U.S. Patent No. 9,354,369 not unpatentable, because PTOT failed to...
Legislation: Will the Post-Grant Procedures Established by the AIA PREVAIL?

Legislation: Will the Post-Grant Procedures Established by the AIA PREVAIL?

by Kenneth Luchesi | Aug 28, 2023 | PTAB News, Standing, Trial Institution

By Nick Bagnolo and Kenny Luchesi – The Senate recently introduced a bill directed to substantially narrowing the scope of post grant proceedings, including Inter Partes Reviews (“IPRs”), before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”).  First introduced by a...
Leahy-Corbin Proposals for “Restoring the America Invents Act”

Leahy-Corbin Proposals for “Restoring the America Invents Act”

by Sarah Geers | Oct 22, 2021 | Amendment Practice, Estoppel, PTAB News, Standing, Stay

By Sarah Geers – We recently reported on bipartisan legislation introduced by Senators Patrick Leahy (D) and John Cornyn (R) to significantly revamp certain features of the America Invents Act (AIA), ten years after its debut.  This proposed legislation,...
Invalidity Counter Against Unasserted Claim Does Not Implicate §315(a)

Invalidity Counter Against Unasserted Claim Does Not Implicate §315(a)

by David Maiorana | Oct 15, 2020 | PTAB Trial Basics, Standing

By Dave Maiorana – It is well-established that a counterclaim for invalidity in a district court litigation does not trigger the 35 U.S.C. § 315(a) bar.  See 35 U.S.C. § 315(a)(3).  See also our previous posts here and here discussing strategies for declaratory...
Court Allows Accused Infringer’s Have-Cake, Eat-Cake Patent Invalidity Strategy

Court Allows Accused Infringer’s Have-Cake, Eat-Cake Patent Invalidity Strategy

by John Marlott | Apr 16, 2020 | PTAB Trial Basics, Standing

By John Marlott – While acknowledging an “apparent loophole” in the America Invents Act, a district court has permitted an accused-infringer-DJ-plaintiff to pursue counterclaims for patent invalidity—with no bar on later seeking an IPR at the PTAB. Epic Games,...
« Older Entries

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.