by Emily Tait | Aug 1, 2023 | PTAB News, Trial Institution
By Emily Tait and Adriane Elinski* – In a recent decision, the PTAB granted institution of an IPR despite multiple parallel district court proceedings involving the same patent, and flatly rejected the Patent Owner’s argument that the Petitioner’s “conflicting”...
by John Evans, Ph.D. | Aug 1, 2023 | Design Patents, PTAB News
By John Evans, Vishal Khatri, and Jesse Wynn – In February, the Federal Circuit declined to modify or overrule its long-standing test for obviousness in design patents, the Rosen-Durling test, despite arguments that the Supreme Court overruled it in KSR v....
by Josh Nightingale | Jul 28, 2023 | PTAB News, Real Party in Interest
By Ashvi Patel, Adam J. Cook,* and Josh Nightingale – On May 16, 2023, Director Katherine Vidal vacated a portion of a final written decision regarding real parties in interest (“RPIs”) in Unified Patents, LLC v. Memory Web, LLC, IPR2021-01413. Director Vidal...
by Matthew Johnson | Jul 26, 2023 | Amendment Practice, PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics
By Alex Li and Matt Johnson – Motions to amend (MTA) are becoming a more frequently used tool for patent owners litigating before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). When a patent is being challenged in an inter partes review (IPR) or post-grant reviews...
by David Maiorana | Jul 20, 2023 | PTAB News
By Alexa Grillis,* David Linden, and Dave Maiorana – On June 2, 2023,the PTAB held the standard enunciated in Astoria Federal Sav. & Loan Ass’n v. Solimino, 501 U.S. 104 (1991) applies to claim preclusion determinations. This was yet another decision in the...
by John Marlott | Jul 18, 2023 | Amendment Practice, PTAB News
By John Wright and John Marlott – The USPTO hosted a “Boardside Chat” on June 15, 2023, to discuss the Motion to Amend Pilot Program, including the recent call for public input on the PTAB’s existing claim amendment procedures and potential rule changes. The...
