PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
PTAB Upholds Patent Claims on Methods of Using Ravicti®

PTAB Upholds Patent Claims on Methods of Using Ravicti®

by Jones Day's PTAB Team | Nov 11, 2016 | Final Written Decisions, Pharmaceutical

By Irina Britva, Ph.D. and Cary Miller, Ph.D. On November 3, 2016, the PTAB issued a Final Written Decision upholding a Horizon Therapeutics LLC (“Horizon”) patent, U.S. 8,642,012 (the ’012 patent), relating to use of Ravicti® (glycerol phenylbutyrate) for treating...
PTAB Declines to Institute IPR Proceedings Against Three Biogen TYSABRI® Formulation Patents

PTAB Declines to Institute IPR Proceedings Against Three Biogen TYSABRI® Formulation Patents

by Jones Day's PTAB Team | Nov 3, 2016 | Pharmaceutical, Trial Institution

By: Irina Britva and Patrick Elsevier On October 17, 2016, the PTAB declined the requests of Swiss Pharma International AG (“Swiss Pharma”) in cases IPR2016-00912, IPR2016-00915, and IPR2016-00916 to institute inter partes reviews (“IPRs”) of three patents owned by...
Claim Construction Defeats CFAD’s Bid To Invalidate Patent On Controlled Release Compositions of 5-ASA

Claim Construction Defeats CFAD’s Bid To Invalidate Patent On Controlled Release Compositions of 5-ASA

by Jones Day's PTAB Team | Oct 28, 2016 | Pharmaceutical

By J. Jason Williams and J. Patrick Elsevier, Ph.D. In an October 5, 2016, Final Written Decision, the PTAB denied Coalition For Affordable Drugs II LLC’s (“CFAD’s”) request to invalidate a patent held by Cosmo Technologies Ltd. (“Cosmo”) that covers its commercial...
PTAB Invalidates Patent Claims on Gattex® Formulation

PTAB Invalidates Patent Claims on Gattex® Formulation

by Jones Day's PTAB Team | Oct 28, 2016 | Pharmaceutical

By Wanli Tang, Ph.D. and J. Patrick Elsevier, Ph.D. On October 21, 2016, the PTAB issued two final written decisions in cases IPR2015-00990 and IPR2015-01093, invalidating claims 1-27, 31-40, 44-52 and 61-75 of U.S. Patent 7,056,886.  These decisions mark the first...
Next Entries »

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.