PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
PTAB Grants Rare Motion for Additional Discovery

PTAB Grants Rare Motion for Additional Discovery

by Gasper LaRosa | Aug 22, 2018 | Evidentiary Issues, Motions Practice, Pharmaceutical

By: Mital B. Patel and Gasper J. LaRosa The PTAB recently granted a rare motion for additional discovery into the question of whether an unnamed party, Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC (“Amneal”), should have been named as a real-party-in-interest.  In Kashiv LLC v. Purdue...
Boardside Chat: Motions to Exclude and Motions to Strike

Boardside Chat: Motions to Exclude and Motions to Strike

by Matthew Johnson | Jul 2, 2018 | Motions Practice

By: Matt Johnson, Josh Nightingale, and Grant Hebrank* The Patent Trial and Appeal Board held a Boardside Chat webinar on June 7, 2018, during which Administrative Patent Judges Justin T. Arbes and Kevin W. Cherry discussed motions to exclude and motions to strike in...
PTAB Considers Efficiency When Deciding Motions to Submit Supplemental Information

PTAB Considers Efficiency When Deciding Motions to Submit Supplemental Information

by Matthew Johnson | May 23, 2018 | Motions Practice

By: Sean Benevento[1], Mike Lavine, and Matt Johnson After IPR institution, a party may file a motion to submit supplemental information so long as (1) the party requests authorization to file the motion within a month of the date the trial was instituted, and (2) the...
Avoiding Estoppel Is Not Good Cause To Withdraw Grounds After Institution

Avoiding Estoppel Is Not Good Cause To Withdraw Grounds After Institution

by Matthew Johnson | May 23, 2018 | CBMs, Estoppel, Motions Practice, PTAB Trial Basics

By: Sue Gerber and Matt Johnson We recently reported some early observations about possible trends at the PTAB in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in SAS Institute Inc. v. Iancu.  See Observations:  Three Weeks After Supreme Court’s SAS Institute Decision.  On...
Additional Discovery: Must Be More Than Mere Possibility

Additional Discovery: Must Be More Than Mere Possibility

by Tim Heverin | May 17, 2018 | Motions Practice

By: Tim Heverin The PTAB recently denied a motion for additional discovery that sought the production of documents argued to be relevant to inventorship.  In Watson Laboratories, Inc. v. United Therapeutics, Corp., Case IPR2017-01621 and -01622 (PTAB April 27, 2018)...
USPTO Director’s Alleged Conflict Not Imputed to PTAB Administrative Patent Judges

USPTO Director’s Alleged Conflict Not Imputed to PTAB Administrative Patent Judges

by Carl Kukkonen | May 14, 2018 | Motions Practice, PTAB Trial Basics

By: Stephanie Brooker and Carl Kukkonen The Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB) recently denied a Motion to Dismiss asserting the presence of a conflict of interest of USPTO Director Andrei Iancu.  In St. Jude Medical, LLC. v. Snyders Heart Valve LLC, the Patent...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.