PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
The Federal Circuit Criticizes A PTAB Partial Institution

The Federal Circuit Criticizes A PTAB Partial Institution

by David Maiorana | Dec 13, 2017 | Federal Circuit, Trial Institution

By Dave Maiorana The PTAB’s practice of partially instituting IPRs has been in the news lately, with Jones Day recently arguing against that practice at the Supreme Court on behalf of the SAS Institute (“SAS”).  On December 5, 2017, the week after the Supreme Court...
Petitioners Bear Burden Of Proving Claims Amended During IPR Unpatentable . . . For Now

Petitioners Bear Burden Of Proving Claims Amended During IPR Unpatentable . . . For Now

by Greg Castanias | Oct 5, 2017 | Amendment Practice, Federal Circuit

By Greg Castanias, Jaclyn Stahl, John Marlott, and Dave Cochran In yesterday’s decision in Aqua Products, Inc. v. Matal, No. 15-1177 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 4, 2017) (en banc), the Federal Circuit issued five opinions, spanning 148 pages, addressing the question of who bears...
Federal Circuit Rules in Favor of Public Interest Group Standing at PTAB

Federal Circuit Rules in Favor of Public Interest Group Standing at PTAB

by Carl Kukkonen | Aug 30, 2017 | Federal Circuit

By Stephanie Brooker and Carl Kukkonen In Personal Audio, LLC. v. Electronic Frontier Foundation, No. 2016-1123 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 7, 2017), the Federal Circuit reviewed a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) decision invalidating claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,112,504...
Expanded PTO Panels and Improper Joinder:  The Federal Circuit Fires a Warning Shot

Expanded PTO Panels and Improper Joinder: The Federal Circuit Fires a Warning Shot

by Joe Sauer | Aug 24, 2017 | Federal Circuit, Trial Institution

By Joseph M. Sauer The Federal Circuit’s decision in Nidec Motor Corp. v. Zhongshan Broad Ocean Motor Co., (Fed. Cir. No. 16-2321), expresses a growing discomfort with the Patent Office’s practice of joinder and expanded panels. Procedural History The procedural...
PTAB Grants Rare Motion To Amend Patent Claim After Federal Circuit Remand

PTAB Grants Rare Motion To Amend Patent Claim After Federal Circuit Remand

by John Marlott | Jul 30, 2017 | Amendment Practice, Federal Circuit

By Christian Damon and John Marlott Last year, the Federal Circuit vacated the Board’s original decision denying the patent owner’s motion to amend two claims in IPR2014-00090, holding that the Board erred by “insist[ing] that the patent owner discuss whether each...
Next Entries »

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.