PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
Jones Day Talks: PTAB’s Busy Docket and What’s Changed After SAS Institute

Jones Day Talks: PTAB’s Busy Docket and What’s Changed After SAS Institute

by Matthew Johnson | May 6, 2019 | PTAB News

In this podcast, Jones Day’s Dave Cochran and Matt Johnson discuss recent developments in patent litigation and appeals, including the continuing importance of the PTAB as a jurisdiction of first choice for patent disputes in the United States, and the impact of the...
PTO Issues Guidance On Reissue And Reexam Of AIA-Challenged Claims

PTO Issues Guidance On Reissue And Reexam Of AIA-Challenged Claims

by Matthew Johnson | Apr 30, 2019 | Amendment Practice

By Matt Johnson Further to the PTAB’s efforts to improve the ability of patent owners to amend claims in an AIA trial via the Motion to Amend Pilot program, the USPTO recently issued guidance on other avenues for amending claims of patents challenged in AIA...
PTAB Statistics Through First Half of FY 2019

PTAB Statistics Through First Half of FY 2019

by Matthew Johnson | Apr 22, 2019 | PTAB News, Trial Institution

By Matt Johnson Institution rates have ticked up while petition filing rates are even over fiscal year 2018.  The running rate for institutions through the first six months of FY 2019 is at 64% compared to 60% in the previous year.  Through March 2019, 763 IPR...
PTAB Denies Entire IPR Petition as Voluminous and Excessive

PTAB Denies Entire IPR Petition as Voluminous and Excessive

by Matthew Johnson | Apr 3, 2019 | PTAB Trial Basics, Trial Institution

By Levent Herguner and Matt Johnson In a recent decision, the PTAB exercised its discretion under 35 U.S.C. § 314(a) to deny inter partes review of Perfect Company’s (“Patent Owner”) patent.  Adaptics Ltd. v. Perfect Co., IPR2018-01596 (March 6, 2019).  A panel of...
Precedential: Live Testimony Not Permitted Absent Prior Declaration

Precedential: Live Testimony Not Permitted Absent Prior Declaration

by Matthew Johnson | Apr 1, 2019 | PTAB Trial Basics

By Kenny Luchesi In a recent decision that the PTAB designated as precedential, the Board denied a patent owner’s request to provide live testimony from the inventor of the challenged patent at the oral hearing.  In DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. v. MedIdeam LLC, Case...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.