PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
PTAB Statistics Through First Half of FY 2019

PTAB Statistics Through First Half of FY 2019

by Matthew Johnson | Apr 22, 2019 | PTAB News, Trial Institution

By Matt Johnson Institution rates have ticked up while petition filing rates are even over fiscal year 2018.  The running rate for institutions through the first six months of FY 2019 is at 64% compared to 60% in the previous year.  Through March 2019, 763 IPR...
PTAB Denies Entire IPR Petition as Voluminous and Excessive

PTAB Denies Entire IPR Petition as Voluminous and Excessive

by Matthew Johnson | Apr 3, 2019 | PTAB Trial Basics, Trial Institution

By Levent Herguner and Matt Johnson In a recent decision, the PTAB exercised its discretion under 35 U.S.C. § 314(a) to deny inter partes review of Perfect Company’s (“Patent Owner”) patent.  Adaptics Ltd. v. Perfect Co., IPR2018-01596 (March 6, 2019).  A panel of...
Precedential: Live Testimony Not Permitted Absent Prior Declaration

Precedential: Live Testimony Not Permitted Absent Prior Declaration

by Matthew Johnson | Apr 1, 2019 | PTAB Trial Basics

By Kenny Luchesi In a recent decision that the PTAB designated as precedential, the Board denied a patent owner’s request to provide live testimony from the inventor of the challenged patent at the oral hearing.  In DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. v. MedIdeam LLC, Case...
Precedential Opinion Provides Factors  For Deciding Whether To Allow Live Testimony

Precedential Opinion Provides Factors For Deciding Whether To Allow Live Testimony

by Matthew Johnson | Mar 29, 2019 | PTAB Trial Basics

By Sue Gerber and Matt Johnson Generally, the PTAB does not allow live testimony at oral argument, but recently it designated one of its 2014 decisions as precedential to give guidance as to when the Board will allow live testimony at oral argument.  K-40 Electronics,...
PTAB’s Motion to Amend Pilot Program:  Actual v. Proposed

PTAB’s Motion to Amend Pilot Program: Actual v. Proposed

by Matthew Johnson | Mar 26, 2019 | Amendment Practice

By Catharina J. Chin Eng and Matt Johnson To facilitate claim amendments in inter partes, post-grant and covered business method patent reviews (collectively AIA trials), the USPTO on October 29, 2018, published a request for comment (“RFC”) on a proposed procedure...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.