PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
Privacy Management Patent Invalidated as Abstract in Post Grant Review

Privacy Management Patent Invalidated as Abstract in Post Grant Review

by Matthew Johnson | Nov 8, 2019 | Patent Eligible Subject Matter, PGR

By Austin Ball and Matt Johnson On October 10, 2019, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) issued a Final Written Decision in favor of Avepoint, Inc. (“Avepoint”) and against Onetrust, LLC (“Onetrust”) in an America Invents Act post grant review (“PGR”) of...
Federal Circuit Says Appointment of PTAB Judges Unconstitutional

Federal Circuit Says Appointment of PTAB Judges Unconstitutional

by Matthew Johnson | Nov 5, 2019 | Federal Circuit Appeal, PTAB News

By Marlee Hartenstein and Matt Johnson Last Thursday, the Federal Circuit found the appointments of Patent Trial and Appeal judges unconstitutional, in part because the judges do not receive sufficient oversight from the Director of the United States Patent and...
BREAKING: Federal Circuit Finds PTAB Judges Are Unconstituional Appointments

BREAKING: Federal Circuit Finds PTAB Judges Are Unconstituional Appointments

by Matthew Johnson | Nov 1, 2019 | Federal Circuit Appeal, Final Written Decisions, PTAB News

On Thursday, a panel of the Federal Circuit found that PTAB judges have to date been unconstitutional appointments.  The panel thinks that it has cured that issue going forward by severing a portion of Title 35 that allows for removal of PTAB judges only for cause....
PTAB Proposes Burden of Persuasion Rules for AIA Amendments

PTAB Proposes Burden of Persuasion Rules for AIA Amendments

by Matthew Johnson | Oct 30, 2019 | Amendment Practice, PTAB News

By Phillip S. Beck and Christian Platt On October 21, 2019, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) provided a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“NPRM”) concerning their rules of practice in allocating burdens...
NHK § 314(a) Analysis Results in Denial

NHK § 314(a) Analysis Results in Denial

by Matthew Johnson | Oct 28, 2019 | Trial Institution

By Tom Ritchie and Matt Johnson The status of a parallel district court proceeding may provide a basis for the PTAB to deny institution of an IPR pursuant to § 314(a).  NHK Spring Co. v. Intri-Plex Techs., Inc., IPR2018-00752, Paper 8 (PTAB Sep. 12, 2018)...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.