by David Cochran | Feb 19, 2020 | 325(d) issues, Trial Institution
By Dave Cochran – 35 U.S.C. § 325(d) gives the PTAB discretion to deny a petition for inter partes review when the same or substantially the same prior art or arguments were previously before the Office – including during original examination, reexamination, or...
by David Cochran | Dec 13, 2019 | PTAB News
In Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., the Federal Circuit has held that appointments of Administrative Patent Judges of the PTAB were in violation of the Appointments Clause of the U.S. Constitution. Jones Day’s Matt Johnson and Dave Cochran discuss the...
by David Cochran | Nov 18, 2019 | Patent Eligible Subject Matter
By Jasper Tran, Sean Benevento,* Dave Cochran, and Matt Silveira Jones Day recently published a recap of aftermath of the Supreme Court’s Alice decision across patent jurisdictions, including the PTAB, in the PatentlyO Law Journal. This paper updates the...
by David Cochran | Jun 6, 2019 | Time Limits
By Kait Crowder and Dave Cochran In Apple v. IXI IP, the PTAB affirmed that the issuance of a reexamination certificate adding additional claims to a challenged patent does not reset the one-year time bar under § 315(b) to file a petition for inter partes review. In...
by David Cochran | Apr 11, 2019 | Evidentiary Issues
By Dave Cochran Inter Partes review can only be based on prior art consisting of patents or printed publications. 35 USC 311(b). Patents are easy to spot because they are issued by a governmental authority of some sort, but whether something is a “printed...
