PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
Judges Disagree on Arthrex, But Rehearing Vote Fails

Judges Disagree on Arthrex, But Rehearing Vote Fails

by David Maiorana | Mar 26, 2020 | Federal Circuit Appeal, PTAB News

By Nate Andrews, John Marlott, and Dave Maiorana – On March 23, 2020, the Federal Circuit denied rehearing and rehearing en banc in Arthrex.  Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., No. 18-2140, Order Denying Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc, Dkt. 115.  The...
The Federal Circuit Closes The (Face)Book On “Same-Party” IPR Joinder

The Federal Circuit Closes The (Face)Book On “Same-Party” IPR Joinder

by David Maiorana | Mar 23, 2020 | Federal Circuit Appeal, Joinder

By Dave Maiorana – The Federal Circuit has definitively ruled on the PTAB’s practice of allowing so-called “same-party” IPR joinder.  The court held that an IPR petitioner cannot join itself as a party to an existing IPR and cannot add new arguments or issues...
PTAB Bar Association Law Journal – Discretionary Denials of IPR Institution

PTAB Bar Association Law Journal – Discretionary Denials of IPR Institution

by David Maiorana | Feb 3, 2020 | Trial Institution

By Jasper Tran, Matthew Chung, Dave Maiorana, and Matt Johnson – On September 12, 2018, the PTAB in NHK Spring Co. v. Intri-Plex Techs., Inc. exercised its discretion under 35 U.S.C. § 314(a) to deny institution of an IPR, despite the petition’s timely filing,...
Motion to Amend Available Only For Challenged Claims

Motion to Amend Available Only For Challenged Claims

by David Maiorana | Jan 8, 2020 | Amendment Practice

By Robby Breetz and Dave Maiorana In Apple v. Uniloc 2017 LLC, [1] the patent owner moved to amend the claims contingent on an unpatentability finding by the Board.  The contingent amendment cancelled the original claims and replaced them with a new claim set.  The...
PTAB Declines Institution After Discovery of Unnamed Real Party in Interest

PTAB Declines Institution After Discovery of Unnamed Real Party in Interest

by David Maiorana | Nov 7, 2019 | Real Party in Interest, Trial Institution

By Robby Breetz and Dave Maiorana To institute an inter partes review (IPR), the petition requesting the proceeding must be filed within one year of the petitioner or real party in interest (RPI) receiving a complaint alleging patent infringement.  35 U.S.C. §...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.