On Monday the Supreme Court heard arguments in the Arthrex case (Nos. 19-1434; -1452; -1458) (click link for transcript) regarding whether PTAB judges are principal officers, who must be appointed by the president and confirmed, or whether they are inferior officers who can be appointed by department heads. The Federal Circuit found the PTAB judges to be inferior officers, who were subject to insufficient oversight. The Federal Circuit remedied that insufficient oversight by severing certain statutory job protections and remanded cases which had received Final Written Decisions prior to October 31, 2019.
We will continue to report in detail on the arguments and further developments in the case.
The following two tabs change content below.
Matthew Johnson
Partner at Jones Day
Matt Johnson is one of the Firm's primary contacts on practice before the PTAB. Currently co-chairing the Firm's PTAB subpractice and involved in proceedings at the Board since the first day of their availability in September 2012, Matt regularly represents clients as both petitioners and patent owners at the Board. He further works as an advocate for clients in appeals from Board proceedings at the Federal Circuit.
Latest posts by Matthew Johnson (see all)
- Claim Construction Stipulation Avoids Discretionary Denial - February 4, 2026
- PTAB Statistics Through Two Months of FY 2026 - January 15, 2026
- PTAB Voluntary Search Disclosure Declarations: A New Factor Supporting Institution - December 23, 2025