PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
Federal Circuit: Plans for Future Activity Created a Substantial Risk of Future Infringement

Federal Circuit: Plans for Future Activity Created a Substantial Risk of Future Infringement

by Tom Ritchie | Jun 13, 2025 | Uncategorized

By Ryan Camp and Tom Ritchie – Restem, LLC v. Jadi Cell, LLC (Fed. Cir. Mar. 4, 2025) (Moore, Schall, and Taranto) (on appeal from Patent Trial and Appeal Board) [INHERENT ANTICIPATION, CLAIM CONSTRUCTION, STANDING] Restem filed a petition for inter partes...
Federal Circuit Reverses District Court’s Application Of Collateral Estoppel

Federal Circuit Reverses District Court’s Application Of Collateral Estoppel

by Matthew Johnson | Apr 11, 2025 | Estoppel, Federal Circuit

By Zac Hardy and Matt Johnson – Kroy IP Holdings, LLC sued Groupon, Inc., alleging infringement of 13 claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,061,660 (“’660 patent’), which relates to incentive programs over computer networks.  Those claims were invalidated via successful...
Federal Circuit Affirms Despite Claim Construction Error

Federal Circuit Affirms Despite Claim Construction Error

by Matthew Johnson | Mar 25, 2025 | Claim Construction, Federal Circuit Appeal, PTAB News

By Alexa Grillis and Matt Johnson – The Federal Circuit upheld the PTAB’s decision deeming an integrated circuit connector patent unpatentable for obviousness, despite concluding that the Board’s claim construction was erroneous.  The Court also rejected a...
Motivation to Modify Prior Art Need Not Be the Same as Challenged Patent

Motivation to Modify Prior Art Need Not Be the Same as Challenged Patent

by Matthew Johnson | Mar 19, 2025 | Federal Circuit Appeal, PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics

By Kait Crowder and Matt Johnson – Honeywell filed a petition for inter partes review of 3G Licensing’s U.S. Patent No. 7,319,718, which claims a coding scheme for transmitting information in 3G mobile communication systems.  The PTAB found none of the...
Federal Circuit Rules That Order Of Steps Sometimes Does Matter

Federal Circuit Rules That Order Of Steps Sometimes Does Matter

by Carl Kukkonen | Mar 11, 2025 | Amendment Practice, Claim Construction, Federal Circuit Appeal, PTAB News

By Simon Maxwell and Carl Kukkonen – Back in May of 2020, European patent-licensing company Sisvel filed a flurry of lawsuits against a dozen tech companies who had allegedly infringed Sisvel’s portfolio of wireless communication and networking patents.  A...
« Older Entries

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.