Expectation of Success Analysis Need Not Be Separate
By Jack Graves and Matt Johnson - In Elekta Limited v. Zap Surgical Systems, Inc., the Federal Circuit recently affirmed a PTAB decision finding certain claims of a patent owned by Elekta Limited (“Elekta”) to be unpatentable, even though the PTAB decision had not...
Deadline IPR Service Fails to Bar Institution
By Tova Werblowsky* and Matt Johnson - The PTAB recently granted institution of inter partes review despite the Patent Owner not receiving the petition for the proceeding until three business days after the statutory deadline. See Kahoot! ASA and Kahoot Edu, Inc., v....
Federal Circuit Confirms PTAB Standard of Review
By Carl Kukkonen and Matt Carey - The Federal Circuit in Sisvel International S.A. v. Sierra Wireless, Inc. (Fed. Cir. Sept. 1, 2023) (Prost, Reyna, and Stark) affirmed a PTAB decision finding anticipated and/or obvious certain claims of two patents directed to the...
District Court Awards Sanctions for False RPI Identification
By Sue Gerber and Matt Johnson - The PTAB requires that all petitioners in IPR and PGR proceedings disclose the real party(ies)-in-interest. While that might seem like a mere formality, a false disclosure can lead to very harsh consequences. In a recent decision,...
PTAB Doubles Down on Interference Estoppel Issue
By Anthony Kim*, Evan Jones, and Matt Johnson - The Patent Trial and Appeal Board held all challenged claims of IGT’s patent unpatentable as obvious over two prior art patents. Zynga Inc. v. IGT, IPR2022-00199-32. In doing so, the PTAB further held that, contrary to...