by Josh Nightingale | Apr 5, 2024 | 325(d) issues, PTAB Trial Basics, Trial Institution
By Ashvi Patel and Josh Nightingale – Director Vidal recently vacated the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (PTAB) decision to deny institution of three petitions for inter partes review (IPR), citing insufficient explanation for denial under 35 U.S.C....
by Kenneth Luchesi | Mar 13, 2024 | PTAB News, Trial Institution
By Owen Carpenter and Kenny Luchesi – The PTAB recently denied Intel’s (Petitioner) parallel IPR petition (IPR2023-01140) against AX Wireless (Patent Owner) challenging certain claims of U.S. Pat. No. 10,917,272. The denial came after Intel filed a separate...
by Carl Kukkonen | Mar 8, 2024 | PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics, Trial Institution
By Carl Kukkonen – The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) in Videndum Production Solutions, Inc. v. Rotolight Limited (IPR2023-01219), recently denied a petition for inter partes review (IPR) of a patent on a lighting system and control for producing cinematic...
by Bill Devitt | Feb 1, 2024 | Petitions, Prior Art Issues, Trial Institution
By Connor Scholes, Owen Carpenter, Bill Devitt, and Dave Maiorana – In Apple Inc. v. DoDots Licensing Sols. LLC, IPR2023-00939, Paper 12 (PTAB Jan. 3, 2024) (“Decision”), the PTAB clarified what is and what is not part of the prior art, and as such what can be...
by Josh Nightingale | Jan 23, 2024 | Petitions, PTAB News, Trial Institution
By Daniel Sloan and Josh Nightingale – The PTAB recently declined to exercise its discretion to deny IPR, instituting review in BMW of North America, LLC v. NorthStar Systems LLC, IPR2023-01017, Paper 12 (Dec. 8, 2023). There, the PTAB held that (1) a Sotera...
by Josh Nightingale | Jan 12, 2024 | Prior Art Issues, Trial Institution
By Justice Hubbard, Robby Breetz, and Josh Nightingale – In AO Kaspersky Lab v. Open Text Inc., the PTAB denied inter partes review after determining that a screenshot of a GitHub repository was insufficient to establish that a whitepaper posted to that...
