PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
Settled Expectations Insufficient To Prevent IPR Review

Settled Expectations Insufficient To Prevent IPR Review

by Mike Lavine | Oct 21, 2025 | PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics, Trial Institution

By Mike Lavine – On September 4, 2025, the USPTO’s Acting Director declined H2 Intellect LLC’s request for discretionary denial of an IPR petition filed by Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. Central to the decision was the PTAB’s analysis of “settled expectations”—the idea...
Director Takes On All Institution Duties

Director Takes On All Institution Duties

by Matthew Johnson | Oct 17, 2025 | District Court, PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics, Trial Institution

By Matt Johnson – On October 17, Director Squires announced that he will assume responsibility for all post‑grant trial institution decisions. When the Director determines that a petition warrants institution, the matter will be assigned to a three‑judge APJ...
PTAB Issues Notice of Discretionary Denial Rulemaking

PTAB Issues Notice of Discretionary Denial Rulemaking

by Matthew Johnson | Oct 17, 2025 | District Court, Petitions, PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics, Time Limits, Trial Institution

By Matt Johnson – On October 17th, the PTAB issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking regarding criteria for the Office to apply when making discretionary denial determinations. The proposed rule would: Require an IPR petitioner to file a stipulation not to pursue...
Discretionary Denial Statistics

Discretionary Denial Statistics

by Matthew Johnson | Oct 15, 2025 | 325(d) issues, PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics, Trial Institution

By Adam Cook, Daniel Sloan, and Matt Johnson – Since the inception of the bifurcated review process at the PTAB, Jones Day has been analyzing every discretionary decision released by the Office.  Deputy Director Coke Morgan Stewart continues to be the key...
USPTO Memorandum Clarifies PTAB’s Treatment of Prior Proceedings

USPTO Memorandum Clarifies PTAB’s Treatment of Prior Proceedings

by Matthew Johnson | Oct 9, 2025 | Claim Construction, District Court, PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics

By Pranita Dhungana and Matt Johnson – The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently issued a memorandum addressing how the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) should handle prior findings of fact and conclusions of law when adjudicating patent...
Federal Circuit Clarifies Independent Conception Standard for AIA Derivation

Federal Circuit Clarifies Independent Conception Standard for AIA Derivation

by Matthew Johnson | Sep 24, 2025 | PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics

By Kate Meng and Sarah Geers – More than a decade after the enactment of the America Invents Act (AIA), the Federal Circuit has issued its first opinion addressing an AIA derivation proceeding. In Global Health Solutions LLC v. Selner, the court clarified that...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.