PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
District Court Awards Sanctions for False RPI Identification

District Court Awards Sanctions for False RPI Identification

by Matthew Johnson | Oct 27, 2023 | PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics, Real Party in Interest

By Sue Gerber and Matt Johnson – The PTAB requires that all petitioners in IPR and PGR proceedings disclose the real party(ies)-in-interest.  While that might seem like a mere formality, a false disclosure can lead to very harsh consequences.  In a recent...
Parallel Petitions Denied

Parallel Petitions Denied

by Matthew Johnson | Oct 16, 2023 | PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics, Trial Institution

By Simon Maxwell* and Matt Johnson – On March 15, 2022, Facet Technologies, LLC (Plaintiff/Patent Owner) filed an infringement suit against LifeScan, Inc. (Defendant/Petitioner) in U.S. District Court for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,840,635 (the ’635...
PTAB Publishes Revised Oral Hearing Guide

PTAB Publishes Revised Oral Hearing Guide

by Matthew Johnson | Oct 6, 2023 | PTAB Trial Basics

By RJ Shea and Matt Johnson – The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) recently published a revised PTAB Oral Hearing Guide (August 2023) updating prior guidance on hearings.  The revised Guide includes changes to: 1. Remote participation in PTAB Proceedings;...
Defective Service of Complaint Fails to Trigger Time Bar

Defective Service of Complaint Fails to Trigger Time Bar

by Matthew Johnson | Oct 4, 2023 | PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics, Time Limits

By Tova Werblowsky* and Matt Johnson – Institution of an IPR is automatically barred if the “petition requesting the proceeding is filed more than 1 year after the date on which the petitioner…is served with the complaint alleging infringement of the patent.” 35...
PTAB Updates Procedures For Interim Director Review

PTAB Updates Procedures For Interim Director Review

by Matthew Johnson | Sep 7, 2023 | Federal Circuit Appeal, PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics

By Sue Gerber and Matt Johnson – Effective July 24, 2023, the Patent Office updated its procedures for Interim Director Review (“DR”) of PTAB decisions.  The updated procedures include the following key provisions: Expanding the process to permit parties to...
Explanations, Not Bare Citations, Needed To Establish Prior Art Date

Explanations, Not Bare Citations, Needed To Establish Prior Art Date

by Matthew Johnson | Aug 24, 2023 | Prior Art Issues, PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics

By Ernie Oleksy,* Robby Breetz, and Matt Johnson – Although provisional applications can be used to secure an earlier date for 102(e), the petitioner bears the burden of production in establishing a prior art date for the asserted prior art. The Patent Trial and...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.