PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
Motion to Amend: Much to Admire?

Motion to Amend: Much to Admire?

by Matthew Johnson | Jul 26, 2023 | Amendment Practice, PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics

By Alex Li and Matt Johnson – Motions to amend (MTA) are becoming a more frequently used tool for patent owners litigating before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB).  When a patent is being challenged in an inter partes review (IPR) or post-grant reviews...
Will “Compelling Merits” Institution Standard Lead To Rubber Stamp FWDs?

Will “Compelling Merits” Institution Standard Lead To Rubber Stamp FWDs?

by John Marlott | Jun 21, 2023 | PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics, Trial Institution

By John Marlott and Ryan Mueller – If a PTAB panel finds “compelling merits” of unpatentability when making its initial institution decision, is there any realistic chance that same PTAB panel will reach a different result in the final decision at the conclusion...
Prior Conception Defeats Otherwise Sufficient Derivation Showing

Prior Conception Defeats Otherwise Sufficient Derivation Showing

by Sarah Geers | Apr 12, 2023 | PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics

By Sarah Geers and Ashvi Patel – In its second-ever Final Written Decision in a derivation proceeding, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) determined that a patent application for a biocidal composition and method of producing said biocidal...
New Case Theories Post-Institution; Better to Ask Permission

New Case Theories Post-Institution; Better to Ask Permission

by Matthew Johnson | Apr 7, 2023 | Final Written Decisions, PTAB Trial Basics

By Christian Roberts and Matt Johnson – Petitioners should be cautious of introducing a new theory in a Petitioner Reply before the PTAB.  On February 7, 2023, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) entered a final written decision declining to find any...
How Long Is Too Long To Wait To Settle?

How Long Is Too Long To Wait To Settle?

by Matthew Johnson | Mar 30, 2023 | Final Written Decisions, PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics

By Sue Gerber and Matt Johnson – An IPR “shall be terminated with respect to any petitioner upon the joint request of the petitioner and patent owner, unless the Office has decided the merits of the proceeding before the request for termination is filed.”  35...
Multiple Dependent Claims are Treated as Multiple Claims

Multiple Dependent Claims are Treated as Multiple Claims

by Matthew Johnson | Mar 22, 2023 | PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics

By Matt Chung and Matt Johnson – On February 24, 2023, Director Kathi Vidal issued a decision under director review granting rehearing and modifying the final written decision for Nested Bean, Inc. v. Big Beings USA Pty. Ltd. Nested Bean, Inc. (“Nested Bean”)...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.