PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
Presenting Complicated Technology Effectively at the PTAB

Presenting Complicated Technology Effectively at the PTAB

by Matthew Johnson | Dec 8, 2022 | PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics

Jesse Wynn, Robert Breetz, Matt Johnson – The PTAB recently hosted a Boardside Chat on effectively presenting technology in AIA proceedings. Patent Trial and Appeal Board Boardside Chat: Presenting Technology in AIA Proceedings, (Nov. 17, 2022) (“Presenting...
Ex Parte Reexamination Barred Based on Earlier IPR

Ex Parte Reexamination Barred Based on Earlier IPR

by Josh Nightingale | Dec 5, 2022 | Estoppel, PTAB News

By Dhohyung Kim and Josh Nightingale – On November 16, 2022, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) vacated a reexamination proceeding because the patent challenger relied on unpatentability grounds that reasonably could have been raised in an...
Limited Stipulation Results In Fintiv Denial

Limited Stipulation Results In Fintiv Denial

by Matthew Johnson | Dec 1, 2022 | PTAB News, Trial Institution

By Ashvi Patel and Matt Johnson – Patent Owner, IP Bridge, filed a patent infringement suit against Petitioner, Ericsson, for infringement of seven of its patents directed at radio communication between a base station and a mobile station and related apparatuses...
PTAB Declines To Consider Substance Of RPI Complaint

PTAB Declines To Consider Substance Of RPI Complaint

by David Maiorana | Nov 16, 2022 | PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics, Real Party in Interest, Uncategorized

By David Linden and Dave Maiorana – On May 27, 2022, Unified Patents, LLC (“Unified”) filed a Petition requesting inter partes review (“IPR”) of claims 1-3 and 5-25 of U.S. Patent No. 7,321,777 (“the ’777 Patent”), assigned to Speir Technologies Ltd. (“Speir”). ...
PTAB ‘Guiding Principles’ Favor Supplementary Declaration in ‘Close’ Case

PTAB ‘Guiding Principles’ Favor Supplementary Declaration in ‘Close’ Case

by Matthew Johnson | Nov 10, 2022 | PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics, Trial Institution

By Emily Tait and Jack Graves* – A PTAB panel recently granted a Petitioner’s motion to submit a second expert declaration that directly addressed deficiencies identified by the PTAB’s Institution Decision. While a “close” case, the panel concluded that allowing the...
Director Vidal Orders Sua Sponte Review (Again) in OpenSky v. VLSI

Director Vidal Orders Sua Sponte Review (Again) in OpenSky v. VLSI

by Josh Nightingale | Nov 4, 2022 | PTAB News

By Christian Roberts and Josh Nightingale – In the latest development of OpenSky Industries v. VLSI Technology, USPTO Director Kathi Vidal has ordered sua sponte Director review of a PTAB panel’s decision on remand to institute OpenSky’s IPR challenge to a...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.