by Matthew Johnson | Aug 22, 2023 | PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics
By Amanda Price* and Matt Johnson – In recent decision 3M Company v. Bay Materials, the Board denied 3M Company’s (“Petitioner”) second Petition for inter partes review (“Second Petition”) after exercising its discretion under § 314(a) and finding that each of...
by Matthew Johnson | Aug 18, 2023 | 325(d) issues, Prior Art Issues, PTAB News
By Mike Lavine, Aska Fujimori-Smith,* Jetta Cook, and Matt Johnson – The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB” or “Board”) recently denied inter partes review (IPR) of an electrocardiography monitor patent under 35 U.S.C. §325(d), finding that the same or...
by Matthew Johnson | Aug 16, 2023 | PTAB News, Real Party in Interest, Time Limits
By Alexandra Boeriu,* Hannah Mehrle and Matt Johnson – Recently, the PTAB held that Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. (“Petitioner”), met its burden in showing that a third party (the “Third Party”) was neither a real party-in-interest (“RPI”) nor in privity with...
by Carl Kukkonen | Aug 6, 2023 | Amendment Practice, PTAB News
By Carl Kukkonen – In an effort to shed light on the practice of filing multiple petitions under the America Invents Act (AIA) at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently released a detailed study....
by Albert Liou | Aug 1, 2023 | Prior Art Issues, PTAB News, Trial Institution
By Albert Liou – In a recent decision denying institution, the PTAB rejected Petitioner Mercedes Benz USA’s argument that the challenged patent was not entitled to the filing date of its provisional application. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC v. Westport Fuel Systems...
by Emily Tait | Aug 1, 2023 | PTAB News, Trial Institution
By Emily Tait and Adriane Elinski* – In a recent decision, the PTAB granted institution of an IPR despite multiple parallel district court proceedings involving the same patent, and flatly rejected the Patent Owner’s argument that the Petitioner’s “conflicting”...
