by Matthew Johnson | Sep 11, 2023 | 325(d) issues, PTAB News, Trial Institution
By Matt Johnson and Jack Graves— The PTAB recently declined to apply Section 325(d) and instituted inter partes review after a patent owner unsuccessfully argued that the petition relied on substantially the same prior art as that which the Office had previously...
by Matthew Johnson | Sep 7, 2023 | Federal Circuit Appeal, PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics
By Sue Gerber and Matt Johnson – Effective July 24, 2023, the Patent Office updated its procedures for Interim Director Review (“DR”) of PTAB decisions. The updated procedures include the following key provisions: Expanding the process to permit parties to...
by Matthew Johnson | Aug 30, 2023 | PTAB News, Trial Institution
By RJ Shea and Matt Johnson – On July 17, 2023, the Patent Trial and Appeals Board (“PTAB”) exercised its discretion under 35 U.S.C. § 314(a) to deny institution of an inter partes review petition based on the stature of a related U.S. District Court of Delaware...
by Kenneth Luchesi | Aug 28, 2023 | PTAB News, Standing, Trial Institution
By Nick Bagnolo and Kenny Luchesi – The Senate recently introduced a bill directed to substantially narrowing the scope of post grant proceedings, including Inter Partes Reviews (“IPRs”), before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”). First introduced by a...
by Matthew Johnson | Aug 24, 2023 | Prior Art Issues, PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics
By Ernie Oleksy,* Robby Breetz, and Matt Johnson – Although provisional applications can be used to secure an earlier date for 102(e), the petitioner bears the burden of production in establishing a prior art date for the asserted prior art. The Patent Trial and...
by Matthew Johnson | Aug 22, 2023 | PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics
By Amanda Price* and Matt Johnson – In recent decision 3M Company v. Bay Materials, the Board denied 3M Company’s (“Petitioner”) second Petition for inter partes review (“Second Petition”) after exercising its discretion under § 314(a) and finding that each of...
