PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
RULEMAKING: PTO Aims for Transparency, Judicial Independence at PTAB

RULEMAKING: PTO Aims for Transparency, Judicial Independence at PTAB

by Matthew Johnson | Nov 17, 2023 | Final Written Decisions, PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics, Trial Institution

By Christian Roberts and Matthew Johnson – On October 6, 2023, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“NPR”) making changes to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (“PTAB”) internal circulation and review...
PTAB Not Required to Decode Petitioner Arguments

PTAB Not Required to Decode Petitioner Arguments

by David Maiorana | Nov 16, 2023 | Federal Circuit, Federal Circuit Appeal, PTAB News

By Dave Maiorana and Megan McKnelly – In a precedential opinion, the Federal Circuit affirmed two Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) patentability decisions, holding that the PTAB did not abuse its discretion by not addressing arguments not clearly presented...
Failure to Make Full Sotera-Stipulation Contributes to Denial

Failure to Make Full Sotera-Stipulation Contributes to Denial

by Matthew Johnson | Nov 10, 2023 | PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics, Trial Institution

By Evan Tassis and Matt Johnson – In an increasingly rare exercise of discretion, the PTAB denied institution of inter partes review under Fintiv in Zhuhai Cosmx Battery Co., Ltd. v. Ningde Amperex Technology Limited, IPR2023-00587.  The PTAB reasoned that the...
Deadline IPR Service Fails to Bar Institution

Deadline IPR Service Fails to Bar Institution

by Matthew Johnson | Nov 3, 2023 | PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics, Time Limits

By Tova Werblowsky* and Matt Johnson – The PTAB recently granted institution of inter partes review despite the Patent Owner not receiving the petition for the proceeding until three business days after the statutory deadline. See Kahoot! ASA and Kahoot Edu,...
Federal Circuit Confirms PTAB Standard of Review

Federal Circuit Confirms PTAB Standard of Review

by Carl Kukkonen | Oct 30, 2023 | Amendment Practice, Federal Circuit Appeal, PTAB News

By Carl Kukkonen and Matt Carey – The Federal Circuit in Sisvel International S.A. v. Sierra Wireless, Inc. (Fed. Cir. Sept. 1, 2023) (Prost, Reyna, and Stark) affirmed a PTAB decision finding anticipated and/or obvious certain claims of two patents directed to...
District Court Awards Sanctions for False RPI Identification

District Court Awards Sanctions for False RPI Identification

by Matthew Johnson | Oct 27, 2023 | PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics, Real Party in Interest

By Sue Gerber and Matt Johnson – The PTAB requires that all petitioners in IPR and PGR proceedings disclose the real party(ies)-in-interest.  While that might seem like a mere formality, a false disclosure can lead to very harsh consequences.  In a recent...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.