PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
Director Says Not Filing Mandatory Notices and POPR Does Not Justify Adverse Judgment

Director Says Not Filing Mandatory Notices and POPR Does Not Justify Adverse Judgment

by Matthew Johnson | Aug 22, 2024 | Preliminary Responses, PTAB News, Time Limits

By Evan Tassis and Matt Johnson – In a sua sponte Director Review, USPTO Director Vidal vacated an adverse judgement against Patent Owner for Patent Owner’s failure to submit a mandatory notice of information or file a preliminary response to a Petition within...
No Requirement to Raise All Arguments in Rehearing Request

No Requirement to Raise All Arguments in Rehearing Request

by Matthew Johnson | Aug 20, 2024 | Federal Circuit Appeal, PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics, Request for Reconsideration

By Lisamarie LoGiudice, Joe Farley, and Matt Johnson – The Federal Circuit in Voice Tech Corp. v. Unified Patents, LLC, No. 2022-2163 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 1, 2024) (Lourie, Chen, and Cunningham), affirmed the PTAB’s determination that claims of Voice Tech Corp.’s...
Federal Circuit Dismisses Appeals As Moot

Federal Circuit Dismisses Appeals As Moot

by Matthew Johnson | Aug 12, 2024 | Federal Circuit Appeal, PTAB News

By Sarah Anwar and Matt Johnson – Koss filed a patent infringement suit against Bose asserting the ’155, ’934, and ’025 patents, after which Bose petitioned for inter partes review of all three patents before the PTAB. The district court case was stayed pending...
PTAB Forgives MTA Procedural Error

PTAB Forgives MTA Procedural Error

by Matthew Johnson | Aug 5, 2024 | Amendment Practice, Federal Circuit Appeal, Motions Practice, PTAB News

By Tova Werblowsky and Matt Johnson – The Federal Circuit affirmed in part, reversed-in-part and remanded-in-part the Board’s decision in the inter partes review of U.S. Patent No. 8,265,096 (the “’096 patent”), and affirmed the Board’s decision as to the cross...
Director Provides Reminders For Obviousness Analysis

Director Provides Reminders For Obviousness Analysis

by Sarah Geers | Aug 1, 2024 | PTAB News, Trial Institution

By Scott Findley* and Sarah Geers – On July 9, 2024, Director Vidal reversed and remanded a denial of institution of inter partes review (IPR) relating to three Spin Master patents.  See Prime Time Toys LLC v. Spin Master, Inc., IPR Nos. 2023-01339, 2023-01348,...
PTAB Updates its SOP for Assigning Judges to Panels

PTAB Updates its SOP for Assigning Judges to Panels

by Carl Kukkonen | Jul 23, 2024 | PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics

By Carl Kukkonen – The PTAB recently updated its Standard Operating Procedure 1 (SOP), which describes the process and guidelines for assigning judges to panels in all jurisdictions of the Board.  This blog post highlights some of the key features of the revised...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.