PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
Statutory Disclaimer After Petition Bars Institution

Statutory Disclaimer After Petition Bars Institution

by Matthew Johnson | Dec 22, 2023 | Prior Art Issues, PTAB News, Trial Institution

By Hannah Mehrle and Matt Johnson – In IPR2023-01058, the PTAB declined to institute IPR, finding that Patent Owner had disclaimed all challenged claims under 35 U.S.C. § 243(a), in compliance with 37 C.F.R. § 1.321(a), such that there was no basis on which to...
Failure to Prove “Prior” Art Results in Denial

Failure to Prove “Prior” Art Results in Denial

by Matthew Johnson | Dec 12, 2023 | Prior Art Issues, PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics

By Pranita Dhungana and Matt Johnson – The PTAB recently denied IPR institution in Sophos v. Open Text because the petitioner failed to show a reasonable likelihood that the asserted reference was, in fact, prior art.  IPR2023-00732, Paper 23 (November 2, 2023)....
Institution Denied Based On Written Description in “Alternative Embodiments”

Institution Denied Based On Written Description in “Alternative Embodiments”

by Evan McLean | Nov 29, 2023 | Prior Art Issues, PTAB News, Trial Institution

By Evan Jones and Evan McLean – On September 21, 2023, the PTAB denied United Services Automobile Association’s petition to institute inter partes review of Auto Telematics’s U.S. Patent No. 9,633,487.  IPR2023-00519, Paper 10. The ’487 patent relates generally...
Patent Owner Unable to Change Inventorship During Remand

Patent Owner Unable to Change Inventorship During Remand

by Matthew Johnson | Oct 20, 2023 | Final Written Decisions, Prior Art Issues, PTAB News

By Hannah Mehrle and Matt Johnson – At the Inter Partes review trial, Patent Owner attempted to swear behind Petitioner’s primary prior art reference by showing that the inventors of the asserted patents had conceived of the invention before the priority date of...
Failure to Challenge Patent Owner’s Assertions Proves Detrimental

Failure to Challenge Patent Owner’s Assertions Proves Detrimental

by Matthew Johnson | Sep 13, 2023 | Prior Art Issues, PTAB News, Trial Institution

By Evan Tassis and Matt Johnson – The PTAB recently denied institution of inter partes review of a patent directed to determining the pitch of roofs after finding that Petitioner failed to directly challenge the sufficiency of Patent Owner’s priority assertions...
Explanations, Not Bare Citations, Needed To Establish Prior Art Date

Explanations, Not Bare Citations, Needed To Establish Prior Art Date

by Matthew Johnson | Aug 24, 2023 | Prior Art Issues, PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics

By Ernie Oleksy,* Robby Breetz, and Matt Johnson – Although provisional applications can be used to secure an earlier date for 102(e), the petitioner bears the burden of production in establishing a prior art date for the asserted prior art. The Patent Trial and...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.