PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
PTAB Issues First Post-LKQ Design Patent Decision

PTAB Issues First Post-LKQ Design Patent Decision

by John Evans, Ph.D. | Sep 27, 2024 | Design Patents, Prior Art Issues, PTAB News

By Connor Scholes and John Evans – On August 6, 2024, the PTAB issued its first written decision applying a new test for obviousness of design patents. In Next Step Group, Inc. v. Deckers Outdoor Corp., IPR2024-00525, Paper 16 (P.T.A.B. Aug. 6, 2024)...
Petitioners Beware: Screenshots Showing Product May Not Qualify as Printed Publication

Petitioners Beware: Screenshots Showing Product May Not Qualify as Printed Publication

by John Evans, Ph.D. | Sep 18, 2024 | Design Patents, Prior Art Issues

By Connor Scholes and John Evans – In a recent decision, the PTAB determined that images of products offered for sale via online retailers, such as Amazon, did not alone qualify as printed publications—even if the images showed the product and the date it was...
LKQ v. GM:  PTAB and Examiner Guidance on Design Patent Obviousness from USPTO

LKQ v. GM: PTAB and Examiner Guidance on Design Patent Obviousness from USPTO

by Matthew Johnson | Jun 19, 2024 | Design Patents, Federal Circuit Appeal, Prior Art Issues

By John Evans, Jesse Wynn, and Erin Bies* – Those following this blog knew change was coming to design patent obviousness in the LKQ v. GM decision by the en banc Federal Circuit.  In its May 21, 2024 decision, the court overruled the long-standing Rosen-Durling...
En Banc Federal Circuit Overrules Rosen-Durling Test for Design Patent Obviousness

En Banc Federal Circuit Overrules Rosen-Durling Test for Design Patent Obviousness

by John Evans, Ph.D. | May 23, 2024 | Design Patents, Federal Circuit Appeal, PTAB News

By John Evans and Jesse Wynn – The en banc Federal Circuit has overruled the Rosen-Durling test for design patent obviousness, holding that the Supreme Court’s KSR decision dictated “a more flexible approach . . . for determining non-obviousness.”  LKQ v. GM,...
En Banc Federal Circuit Questions Standard for Design Patent Obviousness

En Banc Federal Circuit Questions Standard for Design Patent Obviousness

by John Evans, Ph.D. | Feb 12, 2024 | Design Patents, Federal Circuit

By Jesse Wynn and John Evans – Changes to design patent validity law may be coming thanks to LKQ v. GM, a case that we’ve been tracking since April 2021.  On February 5, 2024, in a rare en banc hearing, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit asked tough...
Rosen-Durling Test Back on the Table

Rosen-Durling Test Back on the Table

by John Evans, Ph.D. | Aug 1, 2023 | Design Patents, PTAB News

By John Evans, Vishal Khatri, and Jesse Wynn – In February, the Federal Circuit declined to modify or overrule its long-standing test for obviousness in design patents, the Rosen-Durling test, despite arguments that the Supreme Court overruled it in KSR v....
« Older Entries

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.