By Matt Johnson

On December 8th, the PTAB published a Final Rule, formalizing a number of PTAB practices dictated by case law and described in the current Trial Practice Guide.  The one substantive change of note is the removal to deference to the Petitioner’s Expert’s declaration at the Institution Decision, where current 37 C.F.R. § 42.108(c) is adjusted from:

The Board’s decision will take into account a patent owner preliminary response where such a response is filed, including any testimonial evidence, but a genuine issue of material fact created by such testimonial evidence will be viewed in the light most favorable to the petitioner solely for purposes of deciding whether to institute an inter partes review.

to:

The Board’s decision will take into account a patent owner preliminary response where such a response is filed, including any testimonial evidence.

Other changes explicitly recite Patent Owner’s right to file a Sur-Reply to the Petitioner Reply, in line with the current Trial Practice Guide, and other minor adjustments to bring the rules in line with the Supreme Court’s April 2018 decision in SAS v. Iancu.  

The Final Rule will be effective for Petitions filed 30 days post-publication of the Rule, in early January.  Unlike other rule changes (e.g., claim construction standard change from BRI to Phillips), there is unlikely to be a rush to file Petitions before the changeover date.  But the adjustment to Rule 42.108 will provide a small advantage to Petitioners who are able to complete filings prior to the effective date.

The full text of the PTO’s announcement and a link to the full text of the Final Rule is below:

USPTO publishes Final Rule related to certain AIA trial procedures

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) today published a Final Rule related to America Invents Act (AIA) trial proceedings. The Final Rule addresses three aspects of trial proceedings.

First, the Final Rule implements the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in SAS Institute Inc. v. Iancu, 138 S. Ct. 1348 (2018), providing that, if the Patent Trial and Appeal Board institutes a review, trial will proceed on all challenged claims and on all asserted grounds of unpatentability. Second, the Final Rule revises the rules to conform to the current standard practice of providing for automatic sur-replies. Third, the Final Rule eliminates the presumption that a genuine issue of material fact is viewed in the light most favorable to the petitioner for purposes of deciding whether to institute a review.

Read the full text of the Final Rule in the Federal Register. The effective date is 30 days after the date of publication in the Federal Register. The Final Rule applies to all inter partes review and post grant review petitions filed on or after the effective date.

 

 

 

The following two tabs change content below.
Matt Johnson is one of the Firm's primary contacts on practice before the PTAB. Matt consults on nearly every one of Jones Day's nearly 400 PTAB cases to date. He currently serves as co-chair of Jones Day's PTAB practice.