By Matt Johnson –
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in the three appeals from the Federal Circuit’s Arthrex decision, consolidating those three cases for briefing and argument. The questions to be presented are as follows:
1. Whether, for purposes of the Appointments Clause, U.S. Const. Art. II, § 2, Cl. 2, administrative patent judges of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office are principal officers who must be appointed by the President with the Senate’s advice and consent, or “inferior Officers” whose appointment Congress has permissibly vested in a department head.
2. Whether, if administrative patent judges are principal officers, the court of appeals properly cured any Appointments Clause defect in the current statutory scheme prospectively by severing the application of 5 U.S.C. 7513(a) to those judges.
We will continue to report on developments.
Matthew Johnson
Latest posts by Matthew Johnson (see all)
- Collateral Estoppel May Not Apply When Claim Interpretation Standards Differ - November 19, 2025
- Proposed Rulemaking Aims to Change Access to IPR Proceedings - November 17, 2025
- Discretionary Decision Statistics Update - November 4, 2025