PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
Invalidation Of Patent Deemed Not To Moot IPR

Invalidation Of Patent Deemed Not To Moot IPR

by Matthew Johnson | Dec 13, 2022 | Final Written Decisions, Motions Practice, PTAB News

By Annie Scantling, Robby Breetz, Matt Johnson –  A PTAB panel recently denied Linquet Technologies, Inc.’s (“Patent Owner”) motion to dismiss an IPR proceeding as moot despite a district court having already invalidated the patent because the final written...
Presenting Complicated Technology Effectively at the PTAB

Presenting Complicated Technology Effectively at the PTAB

by Matthew Johnson | Dec 8, 2022 | PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics

Jesse Wynn, Robert Breetz, Matt Johnson – The PTAB recently hosted a Boardside Chat on effectively presenting technology in AIA proceedings. Patent Trial and Appeal Board Boardside Chat: Presenting Technology in AIA Proceedings, (Nov. 17, 2022) (“Presenting...
Limited Stipulation Results In Fintiv Denial

Limited Stipulation Results In Fintiv Denial

by Matthew Johnson | Dec 1, 2022 | PTAB News, Trial Institution

By Ashvi Patel and Matt Johnson – Patent Owner, IP Bridge, filed a patent infringement suit against Petitioner, Ericsson, for infringement of seven of its patents directed at radio communication between a base station and a mobile station and related apparatuses...
Single-Patent Sotera Stipulation Sufficient

Single-Patent Sotera Stipulation Sufficient

by Matthew Johnson | Nov 23, 2022 | PTAB Trial Basics, Trial Institution

By Simon Maxell* and Matt Johnson – On March 3, 2021, Via Transportation, Inc. (Plaintiff/Patent Owner) filed an infringement suit against RideCo Inc. (Defendant/Petitioner) in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas for infringement of U.S....
Door Closed On Petitioner Who Failed To Prove Analogous Art

Door Closed On Petitioner Who Failed To Prove Analogous Art

by Matthew Johnson | Nov 16, 2022 | Prior Art Issues, Trial Institution

By Matt Modderman,* Robby Breetz, and Matt Johnson – A PTAB panel recently denied IPR institution where one of the asserted prior art references was non-analogous and thus the POSITA would not have made the proposed § 103 combination.  The Chamberlain Group, LLC v....
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.