PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
Proof of Prior Art Requires Sufficient Corroboration By Credible Evidence

Proof of Prior Art Requires Sufficient Corroboration By Credible Evidence

by Matthew Johnson | Feb 3, 2023 | Evidentiary Issues, Federal Circuit Appeal, Prior Art Issues, PTAB News

By Sue Gerber and Matt Johnson – Proof of prior art is an issue that often arises in inter partes and post grant review proceedings before the PTAB.  In a recent decision, the Federal Circuit explained the quantum of proof that is required to establish prior...
Director Vacates PTAB Adverse Judgments in Precedential Director Review

Director Vacates PTAB Adverse Judgments in Precedential Director Review

by Matthew Johnson | Feb 2, 2023 | Estoppel, PTAB News

By Misti Blount and Matt Johnson – Director Vidal’s sua sponte Director Review decision of Apple Inc. v. Zipit Wireless, Inc. (IPR2021-01124, -01125, -01126, -01129) was recently designated as precedential.  The decision dealt an immediate setback for Apple and...
Though Not A “Routine Avenue,” Petitioner Permitted To Submit Supplemental Information

Though Not A “Routine Avenue,” Petitioner Permitted To Submit Supplemental Information

by Matthew Johnson | Jan 26, 2023 | Evidentiary Issues, PTAB News

By Ryan Mueller, Sachin Patel, and Matt Johnson – The PTAB recently granted Frameless Hardware Company LLC’s (“FHC”) motion to submit supplemental information to its expert’s original declaration in support of institution.  FHC had filed two petitions against...
PTAB Denies Discovery of Draft Declaration

PTAB Denies Discovery of Draft Declaration

by Matthew Johnson | Jan 13, 2023 | Discovery, Evidentiary Issues, PTAB News

By Ashvi Patel, Marlee Hartenstein, and Matt Johnson – On November 18, 2022, a panel of three PTAB administrative patent judges denied a Patent Owner’s Request for Additional Discovery in Twitter, Inc. v. Palo Alto Research Center Inc., IPR2021-01398.  The PTAB...
Panel Denies Joinder Based On Intervening Institution

Panel Denies Joinder Based On Intervening Institution

by Matthew Johnson | Dec 29, 2022 | Joinder, Trial Institution

By Hannah Mehrle and Matt Johnson – The PTAB denied a request for institution and joinder because the petitioner was the petitioner in one other instituted IPR directed to the same patent, and the petitioner did not explain adequately to the PTAB why another...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.