PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
Insufficient Arguing Below Causes Forfeited Review Above

Insufficient Arguing Below Causes Forfeited Review Above

by Josh Nightingale | Jun 13, 2023 | Federal Circuit

By Adam J. Cook* and Josh Nightingale – Absent exceptional circumstances, the Federal Circuit will generally not consider arguments that a party failed to present in the tribunal under review.  In Netflix, Inc. v. DivX, LLC, the Federal Circuit held that IPR...
Federal Circuit Clarifies Important IPR Estoppel Issues

Federal Circuit Clarifies Important IPR Estoppel Issues

by Josh Nightingale | May 5, 2023 | Estoppel, Federal Circuit

By Josh Nightingale – Under 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2), a patent challenger in an inter partes review (IPR) that reaches a final written decision is estopped from arguing in a district court or the ITC that the challenged patent is invalid based on grounds that were...
PTAB Denies Authorization to Submit Exhibit For Not Following the Rules

PTAB Denies Authorization to Submit Exhibit For Not Following the Rules

by Josh Nightingale | Mar 3, 2023 | Expert Witnesses, Motions Practice

By Ryan Mueller, Sachin Patel, and Josh Nightingale – The PTAB recently granted a joint request to expunge an exhibit and contemporaneously denied the Patent Owner’s request for authorization to file a Motion for Leave to Submit the same exhibit in Bausch &...
A Petitioner’s Guide: Navigating Uncertainty on PGR Eligibility

A Petitioner’s Guide: Navigating Uncertainty on PGR Eligibility

by Josh Nightingale | Feb 28, 2023 | Petitions, PGR, Trial Institution

By Ashvi Patel and Josh Nightingale – Samsung Electronics Co. (“Samsung”) recently faced the issue of determining whether U.S. Patent No. 11,163,823 (“the ‘823 patent”) is a pre- or post-AIA patent.  Hedging its bets, Samsung concurrently filed two petitions—one...
Ex Parte Reexamination Barred Based on Earlier IPR

Ex Parte Reexamination Barred Based on Earlier IPR

by Josh Nightingale | Dec 5, 2022 | Estoppel, PTAB News

By Dhohyung Kim and Josh Nightingale – On November 16, 2022, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) vacated a reexamination proceeding because the patent challenger relied on unpatentability grounds that reasonably could have been raised in an...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.