Conception and Reduction to Practice Dates Matter
By Sabrina Bellantoni and Matt Johnson - In a recent decision, the Patent Trial and Appeals Board found that the disputed claims regarding transferring digital content were not unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) after determining that the prior art cited by the...
Penumbra Illuminates Priority Dates Pre and Post-AIA
By Luke Cipolla, Daniel Sloan, Robert Breetz, Sarah Geers, and Matt Johnson - USPTO Director Kathi Vidal recently designated precedential section II.E.3 of Penumbra, Inc. v. RapidPulse, Inc. and clarified that the priority analysis for an AIA reference patent as prior...
Statutory Disclaimer After Petition Bars Institution
By Hannah Mehrle and Matt Johnson - In IPR2023-01058, the PTAB declined to institute IPR, finding that Patent Owner had disclaimed all challenged claims under 35 U.S.C. § 243(a), in compliance with 37 C.F.R. § 1.321(a), such that there was no basis on which to have a...
Proceed With Caution When Using Wayback Machine® Prior Art
By John Marlott - Just because a document is archived on the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine® does not necessarily qualify it as prior art for an IPR challenge. What is the Wayback Machine®? The USPTO describes it this way: The Wayback Machine® is a digital...
USPTO Director Orders Rehearing Panel Review of Second Denied IPR
By Ben Baek* and Carl Kukkonen - On November 16, 2023, USPTO Director Kathi Vidal ordered a Delegated Rehearing Panel (“DRP”) to review whether the PTAB misapprehended or overlooked certain issues when denying challenger SynAffix B.V.’s petition for inter partes...