Customer/Manufacturer Relationship Insufficient To Bar
By Alexandra Boeriu,* Hannah Mehrle and Matt Johnson - Recently, the PTAB held that Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. (“Petitioner”), met its burden in showing that a third party (the “Third Party”) was neither a real party-in-interest (“RPI”) nor in privity with...
Study Shows the Decline of Multiple Petitions for AIA Proceedings
By Carl Kukkonen - In an effort to shed light on the practice of filing multiple petitions under the America Invents Act (AIA) at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently released a detailed study. The...
Provisional Describes “Incompressible Solid” Despite Disclosure Of “Little” Compression
By Albert Liou - In a recent decision denying institution, the PTAB rejected Petitioner Mercedes Benz USA’s argument that the challenged patent was not entitled to the filing date of its provisional application. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC v. Westport Fuel Systems Canada...
Fintiv Factor 3 Centers on Degree of Investment, Not Substantive Arguments
By Emily Tait and Adriane Elinski* - In a recent decision, the PTAB granted institution of an IPR despite multiple parallel district court proceedings involving the same patent, and flatly rejected the Patent Owner’s argument that the Petitioner’s “conflicting”...
Rosen-Durling Test Back on the Table
By John Evans, Vishal Khatri, and Jesse Wynn - In February, the Federal Circuit declined to modify or overrule its long-standing test for obviousness in design patents, the Rosen-Durling test, despite arguments that the Supreme Court overruled it in KSR v. Teleflex. ...