Motions to Extend Pendency of IPRs Based on Pending Cuozzo Supreme Court Case
B/E Aerospace, Inc. v. MAG Aerospace Indus., LLC, IPR2014-01510, -01511, -01513, Decision Denying Patent Owner’s Motion to Extend One Year Period for Issuance of Final Determination Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 316(a)(11), Paper 105 (P.T.A.B. Feb. 26, 2016) On January 15,...
New Video: Part 1 – PTAB Basics
A new video featuring Joe Sauer from the Jones Day PTAB litigation practice is on our PTAB Litigation blog site. The video covers the basics of PTAB litigation practice, including the different types of PTAB proceedings and their different standards. The video and...
Strategic Considerations for Duplicative Filings before the PTAB – Presentation Slides
Summary of Presentation Slides: Litigants have long utilized duplicative filing of IPR or CBM petitions to obtain the benefit of arguments made by earlier petitioners and to improve leverage for settlements with patent owners. Such litigants often rely an important...
ITC Refuses to Stay Investigation Pending Inter Partes Review
The International Trade Commission ("ITC") has never granted a stay of a Section 337 investigation in favor of an American Invents Act inter partes review ("IPR") at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO"). That trend continued last week when Administrative Law...
Motion to Dismiss in District Court Case Held Premature While Appeal of PTAB Decision to Federal Circuit for Similar Technology is Pending
In Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. v. Hyperlync Technologies, Inc., 3-15-cv-02845 (NJD March 7, 2016, Order) (Cooper, J.), the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey denied, without prejudice, Hyperlync’s motion to dismiss on 35 USC § 101 grounds. The...