PTAB Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Advanced Topics
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Joinder
Select Page
Institution Denied Based on Parallel Proceeding and Prior Denial

Institution Denied Based on Parallel Proceeding and Prior Denial

by David Maiorana | Aug 22, 2025 | PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics, Trial Institution

By David Linden and Dave Maiorana – On December 6, 2024, Comcast Cable Communications, LLC (“Comcast”) filed three separate petitions for inter partes review (“IPR”) of U.S. Patent No. 9,866,438 (“the ’438 Patent”), which is assigned to Entropic Communications,...
Institution Denied for Insufficient Publication Evidence

Institution Denied for Insufficient Publication Evidence

by David Maiorana | May 27, 2025 | Evidentiary Issues, Prior Art Issues

By David Linden, Ernie Olesky, and Dave Maiorana – On October 29, 2024, BabyBjörn AB (“BabyBjörn”) filed two separate petitions for inter partes review (“IPR”) of U.S. Patent No. 11,786,055 (“the ’055 Patent”), which is assigned to The ERGO Baby Carrier, Inc....
INFORMATIVE: Acting Director Rescinds Institution Where Claims Held Invalid in District Court Case

INFORMATIVE: Acting Director Rescinds Institution Where Claims Held Invalid in District Court Case

by David Maiorana | May 7, 2025 | PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics, Trial Institution

By David Linden, Dave Maiorana, and Sue Gerber – On August 22, 2024, Hulu, LLC (“Hulu”) filed two separate petitions for inter partes review (“IPR”) of U.S. Patent No. 11,463,768 (“the ’768 Patent”), assigned to Piranha Media Distribution, LLC (“Piranha”).  The...
PTAB Denies Motion for Joinder After Unsuccessful District Court Invalidity Challenge

PTAB Denies Motion for Joinder After Unsuccessful District Court Invalidity Challenge

by David Maiorana | Jan 31, 2025 | Joinder, PTAB News, Time Limits, Trial Institution

By David Linden and Dave Maiorana – On June 6, 2024, Shenzhen Waydoo Intelligence Technology Co., Ltd. (“Waydoo”) filed a petition for inter partes review (“IPR”) of U.S. Patent No. 9,359,044 (“the ’044 Patent”) (“IPR998”), assigned to MHL Custom, Inc. (“MHL”). ...
Imprecise Claim Charts and Improper Incorporation By Reference Result in Institution Denial

Imprecise Claim Charts and Improper Incorporation By Reference Result in Institution Denial

by David Maiorana | Nov 4, 2024 | PTAB News, PTAB Trial Basics, Trial Institution

By David Linden and Dave Maiorana – On March 23, 2024, Nearmap US, Inc. (“Nearmap”) filed a petition for inter partes review (“IPR”) of U.S. Patent No. 10,671,648 (“the ’648 Patent”) (“IPR716”), assigned to Eagle View Technologies, Inc. (“Eagle View”).  The ’648...
« Older Entries

About this blog

Categories

  • 325(d) issues
  • Amendment Practice
  • CBMs
  • Claim Construction
  • Design Patents
  • Discovery
  • District Court
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit
  • Federal Circuit Appeal
  • Final Written Decisions
  • Joinder
  • Motions Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Petitions
  • PGR
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preliminary Responses
  • Prior Art Issues
  • PTAB News
  • PTAB Trial Basics
  • Real Party in Interest
  • Request for Reconsideration
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Time Limits
  • Trial Institution
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • X
    • RSS

    The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jones Day or its clients. The posts and information provided are for general information purposes and are not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.